What is the future of the West in our rapidly changing world? Reinventing the West is an interactive discussion platform focusing on the changing role of the West in a multipolar world. We invite you to participate and develop new ideas and insights on what this means for foreign & security policy priorities, dealing with economic and financial challenges, the future of international institutions and Western societies.
or Sign up here
Mark Hendriks | 21-12-2011 @ 17.47
I disagree Artur: quite the contrary, we need more Europe! Although I think you're right in pointing out that there will be many more hurdles on the road towards a more integrated EU (e.g the German constitutional court), Cameron's choice is a big gamble that I fear will play out wrongly in the long run, also for the UK government's beloved "city". Politically, diplomatically and economically, it was a failure. Why do you think the integration process "went too far already"?
Read moreJonne | 20-12-2011 @ 10.54
This can of course be argued for every civilization in history, the question is what the Chinese resilience is to declining growth. The social contract with its so far complaisant middle class will be renegotiated, its ethnic minorities might rebel. But what about the potential of Han nationalism?
Read moreJonne | 20-12-2011 @ 10.33
I think the push for agreements was long overdue and is more out of fear of the financial markets than a genuine passion for European integration. As you said, what has been agreed on might still become stillborn when facing national parliaments.
Read moreKiona | 15-12-2011 @ 16.49
In the case of Europe, we can see that the Eurozone country politicians are really pushing for a new Eurozone agreements, thus contradicting the statement made above. However, even though most state politicians are pushing for such an agreement, the real question is how much friction is there within national politics.
Read moreartur | 15-12-2011 @ 16.45
But why you think this is the solution. For some reasons a lot of people believe that if Germany +Netherlands assume all other countries debt the EU will be saved. Why they don't discuss the possibility that it can topple Germany plus the rest of the EU. Print money. Drop the ballast. Then we can move forward!
Read moreartur | 15-12-2011 @ 16.36
China is a way more capitalistic country than a lot of countries in the West. Stores are closing at 6pm!? Is this a market economy!? C' mon be serious. What about the freedom to shop whenever you like?
Read moreartur | 15-12-2011 @ 16.32
Eline, how sure are you that any northern euro zone country would ratify the new EU treaty at a referendum? I don't think that Britain is the only hurdle to the European integration process. I think it went too far already.
Read moreElsa | 14-12-2011 @ 17.50
I have just read this morning an interview of a French philosopher (Marcel Gauchet) in which he explained to what extend the lack of solutions to the economic crisis is deeply linked to the political one that occidental societies have to face. For him, both the political model of liberal democracy and the economic system of neo-liberalism reached their limits, failing either to analyze the causes or to provide adequate solutions to the crisis. http://gauchet.blogspot.com/2009/10/crise-economique-et-crise-democratique.html
In all crisis time, societies ‘values and basis are being test. Therefore, the same reluctant issues come again and again: integration, immigration, delocalization, defiance of public opinion… Isolationism have always been the immediate reaction to economic or socio-political crises.
I wonder if the question of “societies going inward-looking” is truly accurate. Indeed, for me it’s already the case, and there are many practical evidences where state’s interest largely govern the domestic policy-makers ‘agenda.
My interrogation is more about the paradox existing between what national politicians claim being able to do and the range of real possibilities: going inward-looking on issues that cannot be solved solely at a national level is a real contradiction, that populism parties don’t seem ready to understand.
Should Western states stress human rights as a cornerstone of their foreign policies? Are Bretton Woods institutions past their expiry date? Will the rise of Asia lead to military conflict with Western states? Take the survey and give us your views on the future of foreign policy, global governance, finance and western liberal democracy.
Duration: Approximately 15 minutes
or Sign up
John C. Hulsman
John C. Hulsman is Senior Research Fellow at the Hague Centre for Strategic Studies. He is also President and Co-Founder of John C. Hulsman Enterprises, a successful international relations consulting firm. A lifelong member of the Council on Foreign Relations, Hulsman is a frequent commentator on foreign policy issues on international television o...
David Armitage
David Armitage is currently Deputy National Intelligence Officer for Europe at the National Intelligence Council (NIC) in Washington DC. Prior to joining the NIC in November 2010, he was chief of the Regional Analysis Unit in the Office of Analysis for Europe at the US State Department’s Bureau of Intelligence and Research (INR). From 2007-2008, ...
Erik Jones
Erik Jones is currently director of the John Hopkins University Bologna Institute for Policy Research in Italy. His major research interest is the field of political economy. He has held teaching positions at the University of Nottingham, Central European University of Prague and is currently a Senior Research Fellow at Nuffield College, Oxford Uni...
Tomas Valasek
Tomas Valasek is director of foreign policy & defence at the Centre for European Reform in London. He is also a co-founder and senior advisor to the Brussels office of the World Security Institute. He has served as head of the Security and Defence Policy Division at the Slovakian Ministry of Defence. Furthermore he advised, amongst others, the Ukra...
Klaus Naumann
Klaus Naumann is a retired 4-star general of the German army. He was elected chairman of the North Atlantic Military Committee by the NATO chiefs of defence at their December 1994 meeting, holding the position from February 1996 until May 1999. He retired from his position as general near the end of the Kosovo campaign, after which he served as a m...
Rem Korteweg
Rem Korteweg is a strategic analyst at the Hague Centre for Strategic Studies (HCSS). He holds a PhD in International Relations from Leiden University. Prior to his position at HCSS he was a Fulbright Scholar at John Hopkins University’s Paul Nitze School of Advanced International Studies, a visiting fellow at the EU-ISS in Paris and a research-a...

General introduction by John Hulsman

Klaus Naumann Intro "on new challenges"

Rem Korteweg intro "a frustrated superpower"

David Armitage intro "the alliance as an old car"

Tomas Valasek intro "Transatlantic divergence"

John Hulsman on transatlantic divergence

Erik Jones intro " losing the power of collective action"

"Will the west continue to limp along?"

Rem Korteweg, Tomas Valasek and John Hulsman on an interest-based alliance

Tomas Valasek on NATO as a shifting coalition of the willing

David Armitage and Klaus Naumann on European and US strategic cooperation

Erik Jones and Tomas Valasek on role of US in Europe

John Hulsman and Rem Korteweg "Grand strategic divison of labor"and "moving beyond values

Is China more important than Europe?

Klaus Naumann on NATO, burdensharing and delegation of responsibilities

David Armitage on the role of publics and managing expectations

Erik Jones on "leaders and followers, the role of china and global governance'

John Hulsman and Tomas Valasek "NATO as a coalition of the willing" (mag bij Foreign Policy en Global Governance)

Tomas Valasek, Rem Korteweg and Klaus Naumann on the impact of emerging powers on transatlantic cooperation

Klaus Naumann on China

David Armitage "US and Europe have gone through difficult times before"

David Armitage on moving towards global solutions

Rem Korteweg on managing global problems

John Hulsman and Erik Jones on how economics impacts the West's shaping power + China's economic trouble

John Hulsman closes first panel session

John Hulsman starts second session

Erik Jones on difficulties to improve global governance (UN, IMF, Doha)

Tomas Valasek on making China, India, Russia responsible stakeholders

David Armitage: changing nature of democratic politics

Rem Korteweg on the West as status quo powers and domestic concerns

Klaus Naumann on Global governance, decisionmaking and crises

John Hulsman on the effectiveness and global appeal of Western democracy & relationship between government and electorate

Tomas Valasek on Ukraine and appeal of Western ideas

Tomas Valasek on ability of democracies to learn from crisis

David Armitage on the need for governments to level with the public

Erik Jones on the ECB & shifting economic blame

John Hulsman, Rem Korteweg, Klaus Naumann, Erik Jones on the search for political leadership and the risk of demagogues

Tomas Valasek on the ability of western governments to deal with the crisis

David Armitage, Klaus Naumann, Erik Jones and John Hulsman on the need for early warning and rapid response in times of crisis

Erik Jones, Rem Korteweg and Klaus Naumann on how to make transatlantic rapid response work

John Hulsman, Tomas Valasek, Klaus Naumann and Rem Korteweg on the ability to export Western ideas and European integration

Erik Jones on Westphalia & European Integration

David Armitage, Klaus Naumann, John Hulsman, Rem Korteweg, Erik Jones and Tomas Valasek on making flexible institutions

David Armitage on the risk of in-group/out-group in flexible arrangements

Tomas Valasek, Klaus Naumann on the risk of ' rogue allies' and sticks & carrots in alliances

John Hulsman, Klaus Naumann, Tomas Valasek, Rem Korteweg, David Armitage and Erik Jones on making global stakeholders of rising powers

John Hulsman closing